If, after reading this article, you need to ask yourself what this has to do with shamanism just remember shadow. Stalk your own stink'n think'n and keep it honest if your goal is to evolve.
I saw an article posted on Facebook that reminded me of an Alcoholic’s Anonymous saying. AA folks have a wonderful concept called “stink’n think’n.” Stink’n think’n means you’re seeing with ego and fooling yourself to suit your own agenda. There is a good deal of stink’n think’n, for example, coming out of Washington these days It surrounds the political and social agendas attached to the people working there. In any case the article I read reminded me of the old AA concept. The piece is called The Real Reason We Can’t Believe All Women and it’s by Dr. GS Potter. You can find it on Medium and I’ll include a link at the end of my analysis.
I saw an article posted on Facebook that reminded me of an Alcoholic’s Anonymous saying. AA folks have a wonderful concept called “stink’n think’n.” Stink’n think’n means you’re seeing with ego and fooling yourself to suit your own agenda. There is a good deal of stink’n think’n, for example, coming out of Washington these days It surrounds the political and social agendas attached to the people working there. In any case the article I read reminded me of the old AA concept. The piece is called The Real Reason We Can’t Believe All Women and it’s by Dr. GS Potter. You can find it on Medium and I’ll include a link at the end of my analysis.
I’ve read it four times now and I am still shaking my head. It’s psychotically convoluted on so many
levels. I choose not to dissect all of them but will focus on its relationship
to #Metoo. Her premise mixes apples and oranges and then looks for support from
arguments based on self-declaration, not facts. It is #fakenews. Dr. Potter
states “we can’t just believe all women” – that is her thesis as headlined by
her title – but she tries to tie this to race (black women beware (!) because a
particular white woman lied 62 years ago and caused the death of a black man). Say what? Granted, the story she relates is horrible. Horrible
but irrelevant to her thesis. It doesn’t prove “we can’t just believe all
women” and why go to the trouble of taking it a step further and aim this
paranoia at black women and the growing surge of energy supporting all women
who are speaking to the abuse they have suffered?
What this position serves to do is inject race relations into a feminist issue, thereby diluting the feminist issue and introducing an adversarial element. It turns women on women. Is a women about to own her power? Yes? Then let’s discredit women. That is a male narrative. The story as she presents it does illustrate how grossly racist the south was and how black people were oppressed and killed at will by individuals who enjoyed immunity from vigilante justice. It does not prove anything about women in general and to say it does only shows ignorance and harms the #metoo movement, which Potter claims to have sympathy for. It is false equivalence passing for logical argumentation and it doesn’t pass the smell test.
What this position serves to do is inject race relations into a feminist issue, thereby diluting the feminist issue and introducing an adversarial element. It turns women on women. Is a women about to own her power? Yes? Then let’s discredit women. That is a male narrative. The story as she presents it does illustrate how grossly racist the south was and how black people were oppressed and killed at will by individuals who enjoyed immunity from vigilante justice. It does not prove anything about women in general and to say it does only shows ignorance and harms the #metoo movement, which Potter claims to have sympathy for. It is false equivalence passing for logical argumentation and it doesn’t pass the smell test.
Potter claims #Metoo is white led. Fact: Me too was founded
by a *black* woman Tarana Burke in the late 90s and morphed into a spontaneous cyberspace
movement on Twitter when used by actress Alyssa Milano. It is fair to say some black feminists are
irritated because they feel Ms. Burke was not given as much attention as Milano’s
tweet brought 20 years - and a different zeitgeist later – but Potter doesn’t bother
to acknowledge Burke at all. Maybe she doesn’t
know Burke exists.
In fact, Potter is white. She is white and is placing
herself in the position of speaking for and about black people. She wants to
tell black women what to think – as if she is the intelligent one instructing
the little children. White women can and should stand with black women, but white
women cannot and should not, define black issues and in doing so Potter coopts black
oppression for her own recognition and aggrandizement as a defender of the
underdog. This disempowers the
stigmatized person and further robs their dignity.
Moreover, to do so is racist and reflects the attitude of superiority
(conscious or unconscious) of the person coopting the minority experience for
personal academic masturbation. It is racist because it assumes a position of
superiority over the issues of a group she doesn’t belong to and presumes to
speak for. It is not possible to walk in the shoes of a group we don’t belong
to. That shoe won’t fit.
I am also bothered that she has taken the victimization of a
man, conveniently perpetrated by a female, and used it against women everywhere
to introduce a racial element and paranoia into this growing women’s
movement. #Metoo is about women as
*culturally accepted chattle* for men to do with as they please. #Metoo is
colorless. It is uniquely female. I find Potter using the example of murdering
a black male as a reason to question any women’s claim of abuse, to be a misogynic
action in and of itself, because again, her example is really about racism not
misogyny. Don’t say apples are oranges because they share the same bowl.
Potter could have pointed out #metoo has brought a fresh
look and renewed respect for Anita Hill whose bravery in speaking up against a
black man about to become a Supreme Court justice was extraordinary. And what hasn’t been talked about in white
circles is the flak she likely took from her own community – especially males –
for standing up to Clarence Thomas, because she subordinated her blackness to
her sex. You get shit for doing that. Dr. Potter could have spoken to that. She
didn’t. Twice she failed to acknowledge importance of black women who were avant
garde leaders in speaking to the abuse of women. How about #Believeanitahill, would that be
OK?
So, in conclusion, what I gather about Dr. Potter (after
reading this article and researching her), is that her ‘brand’ appears to be
speaking for minorities and nonwhite causes and in doing so she has found a way to make herself a very special white
person. I hope she also accomplishes
some good, but when self-appointed Saviors appropriate another group’s identity
and victimhood, maybe for the sake of a headline, or being the special big fish
in a small pond, all I see stink’n think’n.
For a breathtakingly horrifying
example of how men harass women in the workplace, see this article that
describes how John Hockenberry, “award winning, respected journalist”
(otherwise known as an overweight, dingy, married, white, disabled male in a
wheelchair), who ran a diversity program for the PBS radio station WNYC,
managed to sexually harass, belittle and ultimately deprive women of color of
good jobs. He harassed them. He kept his job, they couldn’t. I wonder. Would Dr. Potter still say, “we
can’t just believe all women” because the perpetrator was white? Does she think that ingratiates her with
minorities? Somewhere around
paragraph 19 is a particularly gross power trip carried out by Mr. Hockenberry.
Check it out if you can tolerate reading it. Also. Don’t forget to note WYNC managed to find a male to put in charge of their
diversity segment. They just had to find one who was disabled so they could justify
it. Sexual harassment of women isn’t about color folks, it’s about power. Here’s
the link: https://www.thecut.com/2017/12/public-radio-icon-john-hockenberry-accused-of-harassment.html
Bottom line: #Believewomen
- without question - just follow the letter of the law in bringing the wrong
doer to justice.
For a look at GS
Potter’s article click here: https://medium.com/@SIIPCampaigns/the-real-reason-why-we-cant-just-believe-all-women-f6eac4105990
© Copyright 2017 P.L.Campbell all rights reserved
© Copyright 2017 P.L.Campbell all rights reserved